Well, it is a scary matter and they both do make a good point. It’s a First Amendment issue, and we don’t need any more laws that infringe on First Amendment rights.” The bottom line is that it is going to limit the ability to gather news. It’s unfortunate that the California legislators feel the need to pander to their celebrity constituents. There are laws that already protect people and celebrities from having those things happen. “If you trespass, harass or stalk someone, you can be criminally charged or you can be sued. Mickey Osterreicher, a former photojournalist now lawyer representing the National Press Photographers Association, argues that there are enough laws to protect privacy and that this would violate the first amendment.
However, there are two sides to every debate and photojournalists don’t see a big deal in this new contraption. I am fearful that we will go too far down that road without providing protections for people first.”
The federal government has made it policy to say that by 2020 we want tens of thousands of these in U.S. We certainly don’t need drones with cameras or video recorders hovering over nightclubs, restaurants or the streets of L.A. 'Justin Bieber and Selena Gomezs peaceful retreat in Stratford this weekend was unfortunately disrupted by the unwelcome presence of paparazzi,' Justins lawyer, Brian H. “We have enough paparazzi issues as it is. Miles and Selena were one of the first few to have been affected by these flying cameras.Ĭalifornia state senator Alex Padilla is trying to restrict this kind of usage of drones from happening: From delivering packages straight to your door from Amazon and showing the world how fireworks look up close, they were being used for some pretty nifty things.īut now, things are taking a turn for the worst and the privacy of public figures may be in danger!Īpparently a few photogs have gotten crafty and decided it would be okay to set up drone cameras to capture stars from above since they are reportedly getting pic-blocked from below. “I just have to say,” Selena stated, “that being here tonight with Steve Martin and Martin Short is the frosting on the giant, glorious cake of working with them on Only Murders in the Building.Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez, Kim Kardashian, no one is safe anymore!ĭrones were first used for warfare and throughout the years they’ve been evolving. Selena Gomez is one of the biggest name in pop industry and has a huge fan following.
SELENA GOMEZ PAPARAZZI SERIES
Whatever the jokes, Selena has enjoyed her time on the Hulu series, which is up for an Outstanding Comedy Series award. Selena Gomez Worst Moments - Crying, Paparazzi Tension & More. “No paparazzi, ever.”Īs the camera switched to Zendaya, who was also giggling with the audience, the audience burst into cheers. “You know what I love about working with these guys?” She questioned. Thankfully, Selena intervened straight away with a joke that is deserving of its own award. “Have you or someone you loved ever considered a reverse mortgage?” “Now it’s time to get to the reason why we’re here,”He addressed the audience in the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. The singer and actress wraps up her session and says goodbye to friends. Quickly, Steve Martin questioned Selena, “How much time do we have left?” She said, “With a good diet and exercise, maybe 10, 12 years.” Selena Gomez is annoyed with the paparazzi after a Hot Pilates session. Martin Short made a joke about the audience not giving him a standing ovation, which set the whole thing off. The Only Murders in the Building actress, however, playfully made fun of her cherished co-stars before to the announcement of the victor. On September 12, Selena Gomez made an appearance at the annual awards ceremony to give the Outstanding Variety Talk Series award. A funny story would be nice, especially during the 2022 Emmys. We often think that celebrities are immortal, but that has proven to be a myth, even so, more recently with the likes of Justin Bieber, and Selena Gomez being.
0 kommentar(er)
